User talk:Emmett5

Note: unless you request otherwise, I will respond to your comments on your talk page. Please sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Thank you!

Welcome!

Hello Emmett5, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia

How to edit a page

Help pages

Tutorial

How to write a great article

Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Solar

Cheers Emmett5

Hey thanks from the uk for the welcome, keep tabs on my work no probs and thanks for the help, i'm just out of the sand box Ta These tilds are hard to find on a MAC Robdav69 00:13, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Death (Old Kingdom)

Hello, Emmett5. I noticed your edits in my sandbox. Thanks! Do you want to help?--The Ninth Bright Shiner ^talk 01:48, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great, and thanks again! I was planning to draft them out, but I got tired and have been preoccupied with real life. I don't have Abhorsen, where most of the precincts are described, but I have memorized the basics of each precinct. My memory is a bit foggy, hence the ^?'s.--The Ninth Bright Shiner ^talk 01:57, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just dropping by to let you know that Death (Old Kingdom) is complete! Thanks for your help.--the ninth bright shiner ^talk 03:07, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that.

Thanks for reminding me to sign my comment. I seem to forget about half the time. I'm sorry. ONUnicorn 16:02, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hi

Thanks for greetings. I copied your tags. I wonder where to find more? Can I make one? MyuserName 01:13, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thank you

Thanks Emmett5 for getting rid of the deletion tag. All I need is some time, research, and the PEOPLE, from all types of perspectives - the skeptics, the conspiracy theorists, the die-hard conspiracy researchers, and those non-believers, so that the article - WOULD BE ONE OF THE BEST. THANKS FOR YOUR UNDERSTANDING PAL. I o u 1. --Lord X 20:36, 18 June 2006 (UTC)User:Xinyu[reply]

Thank you

Thanks, Emmett5!

Thank You Very Much

Thank you for the welcome

If I ever end up doing something wrong just let me know

--MJHankel 21:42, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pre-ejaculate

Wikipedia:Profanity: "Words and images that might be considered offensive, profane, or obscene by other Wikipedia readers should be used if and only if their omission would cause the article to be less informative, relevant, or accurate, and no equally suitable alternatives are available." A picture of some exhibitionist's penis is indeed profane and, judging from the discussion page and frequent deletions, is clearly offensive. It does not add to the article at all, since "clear lubricating fluid that is issued from a man's penis when he is sexually aroused" pretty much tells the whole story. Clearly, you have this on their watchlist, choosing to ignore the link at "Wikipedia is not censored" to Wikipedia:Profanity, and re-add every time someone deletes. And many people will not be convinced by Wikipedia policy that violates their own ideas of what Wikipedia should be. But I hope that you will respect not only what Wikipedia rules say, but also what Wikipedia aspires to be. People who insist on unnecessary explicit photographs will make Wikipedia something avoided by teachers, students, the press, and the general public, since it enforces the popular image of Wikipedia as a Wild West where smut and lies are easily promulgated, rather than a self-regulating source of information that is just as reliable and relevant as a traditional encyclopedia. 192.68.228.4 21:59, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your feedback. 192.68.228.4 23:39, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the welcome and the apology for the rude person. I'll give this a go for awhile, but I don't know if I'll have the time to keep up with it. We'll see what happens. Thanks again! Cheesehead 1980 18:30, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Game

Apart from one word and one line break, your edit to this article consisted entirely of replacing links with other links that are equivalent. I don't understand the purpose of changing [[child]]ren's to [[child|children's]] or [[recreation]]al to [[recreation|recreational]]; perhaps you could explain it to me? Seahen 20:30, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that it may be more aesthetically pleasing; however, there are bots and AWB users on Wikipedia who will likely revert your edits if they see the article. Unpiped links save server space. Seahen 20:36, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

about thyat new england vandal

This one is a repeat problem, permablocked User:Jayone. Preliminary warnings are kind of superfluous at this point, the editor knows better by now. --iMeowbot~Meow 03:32, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re How i mine for fish?

in Episode 730: Oceanography 101 of 8 bit theatre on the "Magipedia" artical Red mage shows Black Mage you are seen replying tosomeone asking "how i mine for fish" do you know what artical was used for that?

Hey I just read that episode and I found the spot where the author copied and edited that information. Here it is... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Fish/Archive_1#Evolution_of_fish. You can tell because of the information around it. Here is the episode too: http://www.nuklearpower.com/2006/08/15/episode-730-oceanography-101/ I thought it was funny. I am reading through the whole series right now since it was completed a month ago. NeoJustin ^{(Talk page)} 20:58, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

HOW FUCKING DARE YOU GET RID OF MY SPACING!!!!!!!!

Howdy

Many thanks for this tip (i'm a bit lazy about these things) sorry! Robdav69 21:50, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]